Techoclaro
All cases
Homeowner lostBindingPending attorney reviewTexas home-equity loansJudicial foreclosure & standing in court

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Murphy

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Murphy, 458 S.W.3d 912 (Tex. 2015)

Court
Supreme Court of Texas
Decided
2015-02-06
Docket
13-0236
Cited by later opinions
83

What happened

The Murphys filed their own lawsuit, which automatically stopped the lender's expedited Rule 736 home-equity foreclosure. They lost, and the lender asked for its attorney's fees.

What the court decided

The Texas Supreme Court held that home-equity borrowers who file a separate lawsuit can be personally liable for the lender's attorney's fees in that suit when the loan documents allow it; the non-recourse protection does not shield them from that.

Why it may matter to you

Filing suit can stop a Rule 736 case, but it has a cost if you lose. Weigh it with free legal aid before filing.

Why it might not apply

It depends on the fee language in your loan documents and on the claims you file.

Most useful when

  • You are thinking of filing your own lawsuit to stop a Rule 736 home-equity foreclosure

How to cite it

The full citation for the first time you mention it, a short form for later, and a sample sentence you can adapt.

Full citationWells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Murphy, 458 S.W.3d 912 (Tex. 2015)Short formMurphy, 458 S.W.3d 912

Draft — check it with free legal aid before you file or say it in court.

In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Murphy, 458 S.W.3d 912 (Tex. 2015), the court held that home-equity borrowers who file a separate lawsuit that stops a Rule 736 proceeding may be personally liable for the lender's attorney's fees in that suit when the loan documents provide for them. Here, [say in one sentence what happened in your case]

Ask Techy about this case

Techy explains the case in plain words, why it may matter to you, its limits, and how to prepare. It only uses this case record.

Related cases

  • Homeowner lostAppeals court in your state

    Huston v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

    359 S.W.3d 679 · Decided 2011

    U.S. Bank filed a Rule 736 application to foreclose the Hustons' home-equity loan. The Hustons filed a counterclaim inside that expedited case, and the court dismissed it.

    Read the case
  • Homeowner wonBinding

    Wood v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

    505 S.W.3d 542 · Decided 2016

    The Woods took a home-equity loan on their Texas homestead that, they said, did not follow the Texas Constitution's rules. They sued years later to quiet title, and the lender said they were too late.

    Read the case
  • Homeowner wonBinding

    Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.

    559 U.S. 573 · Decided 2010

    A law firm filed a foreclosure against Ms. Jerman and sent a notice saying she had to dispute the debt in writing. She sued, and the firm said its mistake was an honest legal error.

    Read the case