Marais v. Chase Home Finance LLC
Marais v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 736 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2013)
- Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Decided
- 2013-11-26
- Docket
- 12-4248
What happened
Ms. Marais sent Chase a qualified written request; Chase's answer was deficient. The trial court dismissed her RESPA claim.
What the court decided
The Sixth Circuit reversed the dismissal of the RESPA claims, holding she adequately alleged actual damages (such as added interest) caused by the deficient response. It affirmed dismissal of her TILA claim against the servicer.
Why it may matter to you
Even modest costs — extra interest, fees — can be the damages that keep a RESPA claim alive.
Why it might not apply
Binding in the Sixth Circuit only. The TILA part went against her.
Most useful when
- Your servicer gave an incomplete answer to your written request
How to cite it
The full citation for the first time you mention it, a short form for later, and a sample sentence you can adapt.
Marais v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 736 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2013)Short formMarais, 736 F.3d 711Draft — check it with free legal aid before you file or say it in court.
In Marais v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 736 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2013), the court held that a borrower who alleges actual damages, such as added interest, caused by a servicer's deficient response to a qualified written request states a RESPA claim. Here, [say in one sentence what happened in your case]
Ask Techy about this case
Techy explains the case in plain words, why it may matter to you, its limits, and how to prepare. It only uses this case record.
Related cases
- Homeowner lostBinding in federal court
Gresham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
642 F. App'x 355 · Decided 2016
Mr. Gresham claimed his servicer violated the federal "dual tracking" rule by moving toward foreclosure while he sought help.
Read the case - Homeowner lostBinding in federal court
Whittier v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
594 F. App'x 833 · Decided 2014
The Whittiers sued the bank and servicers after foreclosure, raising RESPA, Texas Debt Collection Act, DTPA and contract claims.
Read the case - Homeowner wonPersuasive
Renfroe v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
822 F.3d 1241 · Decided 2016
Mrs. Renfroe's payment went up after Nationstar took over her loan. She wrote asking why; Nationstar just said her account was correct. She sued under RESPA, and the trial court dismissed.
Read the case