Techoclaro
All cases
Homeowner wonPersuasivePending attorney reviewServicer errors & written requests (RESPA)

Marais v. Chase Home Finance LLC

Marais v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 736 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2013)

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided
2013-11-26
Docket
12-4248

What happened

Ms. Marais sent Chase a qualified written request; Chase's answer was deficient. The trial court dismissed her RESPA claim.

What the court decided

The Sixth Circuit reversed the dismissal of the RESPA claims, holding she adequately alleged actual damages (such as added interest) caused by the deficient response. It affirmed dismissal of her TILA claim against the servicer.

Why it may matter to you

Even modest costs — extra interest, fees — can be the damages that keep a RESPA claim alive.

Why it might not apply

Binding in the Sixth Circuit only. The TILA part went against her.

Most useful when

  • Your servicer gave an incomplete answer to your written request

How to cite it

The full citation for the first time you mention it, a short form for later, and a sample sentence you can adapt.

Full citationMarais v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 736 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2013)Short formMarais, 736 F.3d 711

Draft — check it with free legal aid before you file or say it in court.

In Marais v. Chase Home Fin. LLC, 736 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2013), the court held that a borrower who alleges actual damages, such as added interest, caused by a servicer's deficient response to a qualified written request states a RESPA claim. Here, [say in one sentence what happened in your case]

Ask Techy about this case

Techy explains the case in plain words, why it may matter to you, its limits, and how to prepare. It only uses this case record.

Related cases

  • Homeowner lostBinding in federal court

    Gresham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    642 F. App'x 355 · Decided 2016

    Mr. Gresham claimed his servicer violated the federal "dual tracking" rule by moving toward foreclosure while he sought help.

    Read the case
  • Homeowner lostBinding in federal court

    Whittier v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C.

    594 F. App'x 833 · Decided 2014

    The Whittiers sued the bank and servicers after foreclosure, raising RESPA, Texas Debt Collection Act, DTPA and contract claims.

    Read the case
  • Homeowner wonPersuasive

    Renfroe v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC

    822 F.3d 1241 · Decided 2016

    Mrs. Renfroe's payment went up after Nationstar took over her loan. She wrote asking why; Nationstar just said her account was correct. She sued under RESPA, and the trial court dismissed.

    Read the case